Redefining an Industry One Relationship at a Time.
The Human System Vol. 1, No. 5
“A
muumuu may be a one-size-fits-all, but effective recruitment isn’t”
Part 1
| Blip overview: Any organization's success can be directly correlated to the quality of individuals that make up that organization. Therefore, the acquisition of the best possible human resource team is a paramount function of each organization. Done strategically, this can create a competitive advantage. Though an important part of every organization, very little formal training or education is ever done on the basics of recruiting. |
Is this your recipe for Candidate Pot Pie?
You must let this sit idle and ferment for two weeks. Sense of urgency does not change this time frame. Whether or not you believe you have a right and capable person internally that will see this posting is of no consequence either.
At
this point you may have some optional ingredients that could really add some
spice to this.
Unfortunately, you have probably had this dish many times, too many times. Sometimes it goes down well, other times you get some serious backlash and indigestion. So what is the solution? It isn’t a one course meal. When you break down and understand recruitment (sourcing) it really is a multi-course meal. It takes a paradigm shift to adopt this, but believe me, when you’ve had more than just Candidate Pot Pie, you’ll never go back to the single item menu.
I
believe there is somewhat of a mental cloud that hangs over recruitment.
I think there is a subconscious quest for clarity and a formula that
works every time. Any time you deal
with people, you won’t have something that works the same way every time.
However, you can design systems that are effective with normative groups.
I
believe the way to bring the clarity and effectiveness to your set of
recruitment initiatives is to see them as such.
A SET of initiatives, plural..
I firmly believe that the solution lies in breaking recruitment apart by
functionality and job family. Each
job family will have similarities and differences.
Those differences and how they are addressed make or break recruitment
success. Part 1 today will give us
the overall model to use in approaching recruitment.
Part 2 will use the model to give application to specific
recruiting differences.
The
key to “sourcing” or gathering of candidates understands that:
RECRUITING IS MARKETING!
In its purist form, recruitment of any kind is marketing. It is important
to understand the fundamentals of marketing and how they parallel recruitment in
order to have an effective recruitment program.
| Aside:
(I have to have at least one of these per week) I have seen some argue that
recruiting should even report to the marketing department.
Personally, I feel that is extreme.
I think that with an understanding of these principles, coupled with the
right personality, that an organizational shift is unnecessary. |
Marketing, in recruitment, is
defined as: an
organization's desire to attract a specific group of individuals (target market)
to the qualities and attributes of that organization and the opportunity that it
represents, in order to develop a mutually beneficial relationship (employment).
Marketing is a function of defining IN SERIES:
I can’t emphasize enough how this is not a list of three components, rather it is a series of sequential steps. Just like the People Flow Continuum, mistakes happen by focusing on a component and not integrity of the sequence of the components. Mistakes are frequently made by not addressing these steps in their proper order. Not only mistakes, but resources are wasted, wasted, wasted. Many times people choose the medium first and never reach their target market. Other times people choose the message they want to send and don't ask if it is the message their target market will be receptive to.
A target market, from a
recruitment perspective, is defined as a group of individuals with a specific
background of qualifications and experiences that would infer that said
individuals would functionally be able to fulfill your recruitment need.
For most organizations and positions (especially management/leadership roles),
the ideal target market is a group of individuals currently successfully
employed; who if presented with the right opportunity, would consider making a
career change. New graduates in
professional roles are a different market, thus approached differently.
Think briefly of the broad job families you have:
executive/managerial, professionally credentialed staff, skilled staff,
laborer staff, etc. Can you see
already some of the different characteristics?
A “Target Market” is different than "who you are marketing to".
You may be marketing to many people that
are not part of your target market. If so, there are costs associated with that,
both in the medium you choose and the time you invest in facilitating that group
of unwanted/unqualified responses.
Where
on the standard distribution curve would you consider your target market?
(I know it seems like a rhetorical question, but bear with me, we will
use it again later.)
You
obviously want people that are above average.
This is something to remember through the rest of this discussion.
Mentally, keep thinking back to what you do, and what the logical yield
is. If you define success in
recruiting as a filled position, I want to you re-define it as a filled
position with the best available talent for that specific position.
Message:
Once you decide and distinguish who you are trying to recruit, your target market, you must answer:
What
do I want to tell them?
Your message should address these three main things:
The goal is to paint a picture
that you perceive your target market will consider attractive and be prompted to
respond to. It goes without saying that this picture must represent reality, but
not all messages are created equal. There can be very different ways to paint
the same picture.
In creating an effective message, ask yourself the following questions:
If you can be sensitive to these questions and develop your message with these things in mind, you will be more successful in attracting better people than your competitors. Realize though, the very best message is ineffective unless it is heard by those it is intended for. So choose the right medium for your message.
The medium is the
method you choose to contact and convey your message to your target market. Each
medium has different factors that are going to have a direct affect on the three
key issues of an effective recruitment program: Quality, Time, and Cost.
Turnover is very costly and
disruptive, recruitment is work; the last thing you want to do is to keep
repeating this process when you didn’t have to. Do it right the first time.
Choosing the right medium is where a lot of people get off track and make
mistakes. Those mistakes translate
into wasted resources, bad hires, longer search cycles, diminished confidence in
human resources, etc. The list of
negatives can go on. However,
understand the juxtaposed positives: wise
utilization of resources (means return on investment, not purely less cost),
better hires, shorter search cycle times, and more confidence in the human
resources department.
When you address different mediums, remember that your message is going to have
different limitations and dynamics with different mediums. It may be limited by
how adaptable to the individual it is. You may be limited to the length of the
message, the amount of information you are able to communicate, and the amount
of interaction you have with potential candidates. For instance, if you are able
to talk to your target market directly you are able to customize your message to
meet individual needs and paradigms. It can also be limitless in length and
content. If your message is in print there are obviously more limitations.
| Though this isn't the
right time to
dive into selection systems, as a conclusion to this segment, it is applicable
that you think of how sophisticated your selection systems do or don't need to
be based on the group of candidates you gather for any position. |
Medium
Options:
Each of the following medium are available options you can utilize in your recruitment efforts.
They are in order of passive versus active. The higher on the list, the more
action it will require of the individual to take his/her own initiative to learn
of and respond to the opportunity. I
know there are others, but here are the top 5 main groupings:
· your own website
· national large jobboards, ie. monster.com, headhunter.net
· trade group websites
Advertising in local and regional newspapers
Advertising in regional or national trade journal
All of these are things that
you can do yourself. There are also outside organizations that can provide all
of these services for you. Time, human resources, and expertise are the things
you must evaluate that you either have or don't have in sufficient supply to
dedicate to this endeavor. The biggest variables exist in the provision of
direct recruitment services. Some of those variables include cost, compensation
structure for the services, operational differences, commitment levels from
service providers, and experience of providers.
Evaluation of service providers is another
sermonette.
Medium
Qualifiers:
To avoid frustration and potential failure, understand the purpose and goals of each medium. That means you must realize the capabilities and limitations of each. Ask yourself:
Though
this isn’t the point to dive into selection systems, as a conclusion to this
segment, it is applicable that you think of how sophisticated your selection
systems do or don’t need to be based on the group of candidates you gather for
any position. The ability to weed
out the wheat from the chaff and find the best amongst many.
The more bulk you have, the more work and effort to weed through it and
thus, the greater opportunity for mistakes.
Next week, we will dive deeper
into the use of different mediums relative to the dynamics of different job
families and roles.
We are all driven by choices,
choose to make it a great week!
Don Rottman
HR Evangelist
Previous Issues: