Redefining an Industry One Relationship at a Time.
The Human System Vol. 1, No. 16
“‘”Professional Recruiter” and other oxymorons’ for $500, Alex”
If you have been
with us since the beginning of The Human System, you could view this as the
beginning of a third overall section. As
you can see this is the 16th issue of The Human System. Issues
1-4 were an introduction and logical validation of strategic recruitment as the
foundation of your organization’s human system.
5-15 have been spent with the introduction of “Recruiting is
Marketing” and the journey through the 3M’s of marketing as it applies to
recruitment. More specifically, we
have spent the last several issues with an overview of comparative dynamics of
different mediums you have to choose from to get your recruitment message to
your target market. As we have now come to the conclusion of the overview of
medium dynamics, it is time to get more in depth, to get to more of the
“meat” of some of these choices.
As I mentioned
last week, we are now going to start diving deeper into different dynamics,
really getting to the meat of building MOST EFFECTIVE human systems.
We left off with phone recruitment and are going to pick up there again.
What I am referring to is taking a researched list of potential
candidates and making cold calls to them to present your employment opportunity.
I don’t personally know of any hospitals that actually do direct phone
recruitment and sourcing beyond basic networking. Thus, we will consider this
the world of “outsourced direct phone recruitment resources.”
Every heard of that industry? Maybe
not by this name, but you know them better as the wonderful world of recruiters
or headhunters. Oh, I’m sure you
have some cuter adjectives and coined phrases…
| Aside: It will be really easy here to lose sight of what we talked about last week. This is a very good, and can be the most effective recruitment medium available to you. Though the right firms and individuals may be endangered species, they do exist. The purpose here is to probe and understand the answer to your question: “Why, if it is so good, does it feel so bad?” |
Before
you get too negative, we have to look at and appreciate the nature of these
gifted individuals. No professional
gene pool has ever produced such a line of inherently psychic offspring.
What am I talking about? Surely
you have seen them on HRCN, the HR Cable Network, the commercials for the
“Psychic Recruiter Hotline.” You
get calls from these psychic/gifted people all the time; don’t you realize
their immediate value? Tell me if
you have ever heard these words, “I have the perfect person…”
Lets
dissect this a little bit. First of
all the only perfect person walked the earth 2000 years ago.
Second, how do they know what the ‘perfect person’ is without knowing
the specific dynamics of your organization’s culture and the unique
issues/dynamics of that department?
See, the reality of that conversation rests in the second, unspoken half of that sentence: “I have the perfect person…now tell me what you are looking for.”
Now, is this the entire recruitment industry?
NO, just the part I think you experience most often and thus, the way
your constructs and paradigms get formed and cemented.
I believe that 85% in this group are contingency recruiters.
| Aside: I need to be fair and make a distinction here. As we talk about direct phone recruitment, this is really geared at management level individuals. There are not many types of staff or individual contributors in a hospital environment that are accessible via the phone. So, understand that we are not addressing a specific job family here as much as we are an organizational level; department manager/director level and above. |
| Aside: At this point, you either think this is going to be a cool and insightful trip or a waste of your time. I will challenge you this way. If you think this is a waste of time, keep doing exactly what you have always done and be exactly what and who you are. For those that want to continue…remember the above average phenomenon….you just passed that group and are on your way to the top. The medium has value, great value, even if most that practice it don’t provide it. You don’t need a lot. Honestly, a great part of why you have had such bad experiences with outside recruiters is that you don’t understand enough about the industry to know how to choose the type of firm to work with, how to evaluate different firms, and how to frame your relationships so that you have the right expectations and results. THAT is why this whole thing is truly of golden value to you. OK, that was a soapbox, but if I’m not direct, I’m afraid you will miss the value of this thing. In case you missed that…I’m blaming you for ½ of what is wrong with the executive search industry. The rest is their fault, but if you were better consumers, you could/would run enough of them out of business that it would only help you. |
Is
it going to get better? I wish I
could tell you that it would. There
are several reasons for this. First
of all, you can be a sloppy recruiter working out of your house and make as much
money as you might doing a lot of other things.
You know what the industry standard range of fees is.
If you had no staff, no overhead, etc. to support, it is a healthy margin
business. However, while this person
is making a placement every other month, making ends meet, what is the
tremendous amount of ineffective activity they leave in their wake?
That is the stuff that strains you…and me.
I
subscribe to the ERE, the electronic recruiting exchange. There are articles and
a discussion board that gives information and the ability to interact and ask
questions of this e-community. The
following is just one example of several like it that will just give you an
aneurysm:
“I’m starting my own recruiting service and I’m fairly new at it. Is there anyone out here that can lead me in the right direction? Is there any software or books that can get me started? I would really appreciate it. Thank you.”
Guess
what, this person is now the president of her own company, XYZ staffing.
And yes, the XYZ is a healthcare related name.
She may be calling on you soon.
Another
“Oh, gee, not more” thing you are going to be dealing with is the high-tech
overflow. Obviously, this needs some
explanation. During the blitz growth
of the dot com world in the last 5 years, there has been a large growth in the
recruiting industry. There was such
a shortage of “mission critical” staff IT people; very similar to the
nursing shortage. The difference is
that these high tech firms readily paid recruiter fees without blinking if you
could just produce resumes that were “close”.
These people did very well financially from this.
With the crunch of that industry, and all of the new people that got into
recruiting as a result of it, they are now looking for a “new industry”.
There was an article just this last week that suggested these people look
at healthcare as an industry to switch to. Just
wait until this group starts calling you. The
high tech world works in a very different culture and mentality than hospitals.
I won’t take the time right now to overly explain those dynamics, but
lets just say there is a very heightened sense of, “You have to be responsive
to me because I have what you are looking for.”
It’s coming to a voice mail near you.
Both
of these dynamics are only in addition to the already “professional
recruiters” that you have become accustomed to.
So
what is it about this “recruiter world” anyway?
Where do these people come from, and can we send them back to Cluelessia?
Well, understand, have you ever talked to a recruiter that said, “Yep,
right out of college, I wanted to be a recruiter.”
I don’t know any. 98% of
recruiters get in the business by mistake or accident.
It isn’t something they sought out to do.
Many have “industry experience” in whatever field they decide to
recruit in. However, look at that
dynamic. What it says is this:
“If I know what it is like to be a hospital CEO, or a nurse, a lab director, etc. I could be a great recruiter of these people.”
That
is the logic. However, what they
lack is the very fundamental understanding that being a good recruiter is a
specific and developed skill. If you
reverse the logic:
“I’m a great healthcare recruiter, have found many CFO’s, pharmacists, nurses, etc., I could go be a pharmacist, nurse, CFO, etc.”
This
is the point that we make everyone pee in a cup, cause someone is smokin’
something! It doesn’t work like
that. Truly, being a good recruiter
is a learned and developed skill. The
problem is there aren’t enough really good ones to let you see and understand
this.
What
happens? Why aren’t they all
“developed”? Well, my
explanation is this: When recruiters
join a firm or start XYZ staffing, they can get a book, or they go through a
training program that gives them “the formula” for making placements.
What do I mean? (I’m going
to use their jargon here) If you
make X# of calls, you will get X# of job orders, or X# of candidates.
Of these X# of candidates, you get X# of send-outs, yielding X# of
interviews. If you have X# of
interviews, we know you will make a placement.
Thus, you need to just make X# of calls per day and keep working the
process. People, this is absolutely not
an exaggeration. It is all about numbers and traffic; quantity vs. quality. Did
you notice, there is nothing mentioned here about the principles of recruitment,
human nature, your human system; nothing about organizational dynamics and
assessment. Thus, going back to comments above, you can understand why most
recruiters don’t understand recruitment, they understand a mechanical
process.
Have
I adequately discouraged you from ever using another recruiter?
I hope not. Remember, I told
you that direct phone recruitment gives you the very best probability to find
the very best people for your organization.
This medium is done mostly by outside recruiters.
However, for you to be able to be a prudent and less frustrated consumer
of this service, you need to understand it better than you do today, more than
you may want to. Only then can you
glean the value of this medium and truly make yours a more effective human
system.
As
a preview, the next issues of The Human System will be:
I’ll
apologize if you have to go take some aspirin.
However, I’m having fun, so you choose to too.
I hope you can recognize the pearls before you.
Choose
to make it a great week!
HR
Evangelist
******CONTEST*****CONTEST*****CONTEST******
|
P.S.
I mentioned that this may be the most misunderstood and misused
medium of all. But, instead of
a soapbox (at least this soon), I want to make this a bit fun too.
Thus, here is the contest du jour.
What is your worst experience with an outside recruiter?
I want to compile a top 10 list and share it with you for all of us
to get a giggle from. Believe
me, I have heard and experienced some doozies.
Here is one for you to try to beat: A
candidate for a Director of Business Office Services position:
Has not only one, but two bachelors degrees AND a masters degree.
When it came time to verify education…NO DEGREE.
Not a Masters, not TWO bachelors, not one bachelor degree.
I believe she did have an associate’s degree.
When asked why she lied, would you believe she said it was a
recruiter that told her to? Yep.
Ironically, some of the best business office directors don’t even
have degrees. However,
integrity is a prerequisite every time.
So there is the bench mark, you got one as good or better? Let me hear it. Just hit the “Feedback” button at the bottom of this and it will come strait to me. The top one will get a copy of “Topgrading,” by Bradford Smart, Ph.D. Places 2 and 3 will get the book review synopsis of “Topgrading.” Everyone will get the top 10 list. |
P.S.S.
I know you get a lot of hype email. I
hope you have seen T.H.S. as different.
Many, many hours have gone into these 15 issues of “The Human
System.” You are yet to have heard
a single self-propagating word. There
have been no sponsors, secondary marketing etc.
In time, I will tell you who we are and what we do for those that don’t
know us. However, until then, take
the information and get as much of an MBA in recruitment as you can.
I still contend that in 15 issues, you haven’t found a single principle
that you can argue with or call wrong. I
think that’s enough of a batting average to stick around, if nothing else, to
see how long I can keep up that average.
Previous Issues: